Philip Sekulic vs S D Prajwal Dev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W W W L
Form
W W L L W L W L W LHead-2-Head: Sekulic 2 - 1 Dev
They have played 7 sets in total, with Sekulic winning 5 and Dev winning 2. The last match between Sekulic and Dev was at the M25 Nakhon Si Thammarat, 15-06-2023, Second, Hard with Philip Sekulic getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Philip Sekulic | 2 |
| S D Prajwal Dev | 1 |
M25 Nakhon Si Thammarat(15-06-2023)
6
2
6
4
| Sekulic | Stats | Dev |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (10-9) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 375 | Ranking | 728 |
| 225 | Highest Rank | 595 |
| 21 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (111-88) | Career Total W/L | 50% (169-167) |
| $92,390 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Raducanu VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Philip Sekulic
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
15
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Philip Sekulic
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
65 of
88)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
88)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
47%
(
27 of
58)
1st Serve %
41%
(
19 of
46)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 37 | Games Won | 26 |
| 27 | Aces (Total) | 10 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:52:40 | Average Match Time | 1:52:40 |
| 65% (140/215) | 1st Serve % | 56% (114/202) |
| 74% (103/140) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (75/114) |
| 47% (35/75) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (43/88) |
| 48% (10/21) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (5/17) |
| 42% (84/202) | Return Points Win % | 36% (77/215) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Philip Sekulic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Philip Sekulic
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
98)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
35 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
6-0 6-7(6) 6-6 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Yuta Shimizu
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
24 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Philip Sekulic
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Alexander Blockx
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve %
52%
(
12 of
23)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
47%
(
15 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
32
Total Points Won
23
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Ryuki Matsuda
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Kohei Hayashi
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
24 of
35)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
51
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Philip Sekulic
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Naoya Honda
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
2-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
S D Prajwal Dev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Brandon Perez
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
8
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
0
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maximus Jones
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
48%
(
37 of
77)
13
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
24 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
23 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(3) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Karol Filar
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
68%
(
28 of
41)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aryan Shah
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Kriish Tyagi
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madhwin Kamath
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
44%
(
22 of
50)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
51
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(7) 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexandr Binda
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
50%
(
34 of
68)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Woobin Shin
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Kabir Hans
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (111/88) | Win/Loss | 50% (169/167) |
| 55% (257/208) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (388/363) |
| 52% (2350/2142) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3491/3262) |
| 57% (96/71) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (120/118) |
| 45% (10/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 51% (49/48) |
| 33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 57% (4/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 789 | Aces Total | 696 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 544 | Total Double Faults | 564 |
| 1:50:47 | Average Match Time | 1:17:37 |
| 428.81 | Average Opponent Rank | 426.16 |
| 62% (8503/13754) | 1st Serve % | 59% (9218/15715) |
| 70% (5936/8503) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (6141/9218) |
| 51% (2655/5251) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3250/6497) |
| 41% (560/1366) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (807/1837) |
| 39% (5345/13616) | Return Points Win % | 42% (7021/16551) |
| 20% (1/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (3/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (46/45) | Challenger W/L | 25% (5/15) |
| 63% (59/35) | Futures W/L | 52% (164/152) |
| 57% (110/194) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (167/321) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 17% (1/6) |
| 48% (36/75) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (29/65) |
| 51% (36/70) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (37/83) |
| 85% (112/95) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (171/149) |
| 14% (112/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (171/21) |
| 18% (87/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (165/20) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
